Tommaso Compagnucci vs Kristijan Juhas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Juhas has shown slightly better performance on their second serve, winning 46.53% of points compared to Compagnucci's 45.21%. Does a small edge on the second serve sway match predictions? It certainly does, indicating Juhas might have a serving advantage.
• When examining return games, Compagnucci has outperformed Juhas, capturing 45.41% of their opponent's second serve points versus Juhas' 38.76%. Additionally, Compagnucci leads in first serve return points won, with 34.38% to Juhas' 29.44%.
• Under pressure, Juhas has an edge, saving 53.09% of breakpoints compared to Compagnucci's 43.86%. Could this breakpoint saving ability be crucial in clutch moments? Likely, as it may determine the outcome in tight scenarios.
• Overall match performance over the past year shows Juhas winning 77.78% of matches, slightly edging out Compagnucci's 69.23%.
• Both players excel on clay; however, Juhas has a marginal advantage with a 65% win rate on this surface, slightly above Compagnucci's 60%.
• Regarding player level experience, Juhas has maintained a strong win ratio of 77.78% in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, slightly better than Compagnucci's 73.77% at the same level.
• In terms of opponent quality, Juhas has faced higher-ranked opponents on average (278.61) than Compagnucci (366.83), potentially giving Juhas a competitive edge.
• Looking at deciding set performance, Juhas shows a perfect track record, winning all deciding sets over the last year, suggesting resilience under pressure. In contrast, Compagnucci has won 64% of these matches.
• Both players have comparable abilities in converting breakpoints, with Juhas at 42.42% and Compagnucci close behind at 41.21%.

Editorial Prediction (May 31, 2025, UTC):

Juhas and Compagnucci bring different strengths to their upcoming match. Juhas demonstrates a slight edge in second serve performance, which could be pivotal in close games. Coupled with their ability to save breakpoints effectively, Juhas seems well-equipped to handle high-pressure points.

On the other hand, Compagnucci's robust return game, especially against first and second serves, may pose challenges for Juhas. Compagnucci's capacity to break serves could offset some of Juhas' serving advantages.

Despite these strengths from Compagnucci, Juhas' experience against higher-ranked opponents, their near-perfect deciding set performance, and a slightly superior win percentage on clay suggest that they might be better prepared for this particular challenge.

Considering all the statistics and recent performances, Juhas appears to have a slight edge and could be the more likely winner in this match.